menu-hamburger-svgrepo-com

Comparing two pMDIs

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

 

However, there was no study that performed a direct head-to-head comparison of treatment outcomes between inhaled drugs with extra-fine particles and those with non-extra-fine particles under other controlled clinical conditions (including inhaler device). 

An independent, phase IV double-blind, the double-dummy randomised clinical trial compared two pMDIs containing formoterol fumarate dihydrate/beclomethasone dipropionate (FORM/BDP), an ICS/LABA with extra-fine particles and formoterol fumarate dihydrate/budesonide (FORM/BUD), an ICS/LABA with non-extra-fine particles. 

 

The research was funded by the Korean government. Despite a very small study population (40 patients randomised and 24 patients completed), short study duration (eight weeks), asthma control using pMDIs with extra-fine particles may relieve smaller airway obstruction more than those with non-extra-fine particles, despite no significant differences in overall treatment outcomes.  

 

METHODS 

In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy parallel-group study, 40 adult asthmatics were randomized to the FORM/BDP group (n=18; active FORM/BDP and placebo FORM/BUD) or FORM/BUD group (n=22; active FORM/BUD and placebo FORM/BDP). During the two visits (baseline and end of eight-week treatment), subjects were asked to answer questionnaires including asthma control test (ACT), asthma control questionnaires (ACQ), and Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adult Korean Asthmatics (QLQAKA).  

 

Lung function, compliance with an inhaler, and inhaler-handling skills were also assessed. 

 

RESULTS 

Ten subjects in the FORM/BDP group and 14 in the FORM/BUD group completed follow-up visits. ACT, ACQ, QLQAKA (a primary outcome), and adverse events did not differ between the two groups. We found that the increase in forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of the pulmonary volume in the FORM/BDP group was higher than in the FORM/BUD group.  

 

Regarding preference, subjects responded that the plume velocity of FORM/BDP was higher but more adequate than that of FORM/BUD.  

 

CONCLUSION 

The use of pMDI with extra-fine particles may relieve small airway obstruction more than the one with non-extra-fine particles despite no significant differences in overall treatment outcomes. The pMDI with extra-fine particles improved forced expiratory flow (FEF)25-75 (p=0.037) and forced expiratory volume (FEV)1/forced vital capacity (FVC) (p=0.043) more than the non-extra-fine particles after eight weeks of treatment, which suggests that inhaled drugs with extra-fine particles have better therapeutics advantages in treating inflammation and bronchoconstriction of small airways.

 

REFERENCES:  

 

Nam T-H, Kang S-Y, Lee SM et al. Comparison of Two pMDIs in Adult Asthmatics: A Randomized Double-Blind Double-Dummy Clinical Trial. Tuberc Respir Dis 2022;85(1):25-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2021.0093. 

 

Suggested Articles

Suggested Clinical & CPD content

CPD: 1pt

Related articles

Welcome to Medical Academic​

Get the most out of Medical Academic by telling us your occupation. This helps us create more great content for you and the community.

idea

1000’s of Clinical and CPD content compiled by Key Opinion Leaders and our expert medical editors.

connection

Access to medical webinars and events

Group 193

Access medical journals from industry leaders and expert medical editorials.

Congratulations! Your account was successfully created.

Please check your email for an activation mail. Click the activation link to activate your account

Stay up to date

Search for anything across CPD, webinars and journals
idea

1000’s of Clinical and CPD content compiled by Key Opinion Leaders and our expert medical editors.

connection

Access to medical webinars and events

Group 193

Access medical journals from industry leaders and expert medical editorials.

Congratulations! You have successfully booked your seat.

All webinar details will be emailed to your email address.

Did you know, you can book future webinars with a single click if you register an account with Medical Academic.

Congratulations! Your account was successfully created.

Your webinar seat has been booked and all webinar details will be emailed to your registered email address

Why not register for Medical Academic while booking your seat for this webinar?

Future Medical Academic webinars can be booked with a single click, all with a Medical Academic account… and it’s FREE.

Book webinar & create your account

* (Required)

idea

1000’s of Clinical and CPD content compiled by Key Opinion Leaders and our expert medical editors.

connection

Access to medical webinars and events

Group 193

Access medical journals from industry leaders and expert medical editorials.

Congratulations! Your account was successfully created.

Thank you for registering. You can now log in to your account.

Create your account

* (Required)

Login with One Time Pin (OTP)

Enter your registered email address to receive an OTP

A verification code will be sent to your email address. Please ensure that admin@medicalacademic.co.za is on your safe sender list.

We've sent your OTP