For over 200 years, medical professionals have used body mass index (BMI) as a tool to determine the overall health status of an individual. Using a simple equation of weight to height, people can be classified as underweight, healthy weight, overweight, or obese.

Athletes always have a higher BMI due to their higher-than-average muscle weight.

But research suggests BMI may not be the best indicator of health on its own. How do we measure what’s healthy? That’s just one of the questions that health care, academic, media, and other experts addressed in an event hosted by The Atlantic and Abbott.


Some health professionals think this technique is outdated while others appreciate the simplicity. “BMI is an easy and cost-effective way to figure out someone’s degree of health,” said Dr Rachel Bond, associate director of the Women’s Heart Health Program at Lenox Hill Hospital. Professor and registered dietitian Dr Carla Prado agreed, “We can’t ignore how much we’ve learned from BMI; it works well for measuring levels of obesity.”

As a research tool, BMI helps classify people of varying ages, genders, demographics, and locations into basic groups based on fat mass – but beyond that, grouping people based on this single number may have its limits in defining health status.


While many healthcare providers in the room pointed out the benefits of BMI, they also understood the limitations. “Some of the problems with BMI are that health varies so greatly from person to person with the same BMI, and the score doesn’t take into account people with different body composition or fat to muscle ratio, like cancer survivors or bodybuilders,” said Dr Prado.

“As athletes, we always have a higher BMI because our muscle weight tips the scales,” explained Sharon Monplaisir, a three-time Olympic fencer for the United States. These nuances underline the importance of finding alternative ways to assess where people fall on the health spectrum.


The conversation turned to the important ways in which muscle factors into health, such as mobility and balance, strength, immunity, and wound healing.

“We tend to focus on these arbitrary numbers, instead of behaviours,” said Mary Jane Detroyer, a registered dietitian and personal trainer. “For example, if you don’t have muscle mass, you can’t get out of a chair,” she explained.

Dr Suzette Pereira, a researcher at Abbott added, “Once you turn 40, you can lose up to 8% of your muscle each year. Maintaining muscle is really important for movement and for metabolism.”

The experts agreed that muscle can be a good indicator of health status since it correlates with quality of life. But, how can a physician measure indicators of muscle health in a simple way?


There are several ways to measure a person’s muscle mass, including MRIs, DEXA scans, and portable ultrasounds. Yet something as simple as looking at someone’s walking speed also known as gait speed may be able to give physicians some insight.

“Gait speed, or how fast you can walk for a fixed time, is a strong indicator of people’s health,” Dr Pereira explained. Research suggests that gait speed can help predict negative health outcomes and has even been associated with life expectancy in older adults.

Performing a test to measure walking speed over a short distance could be an effective way to establish health status. Another indicator of muscle health is gauging a person’s ability to rise from a chair without using their hands for assistance.

Heather Milton, senior exercise physiologist at the Sports Performance Centre at NYU Langone Health, suggests asking patients if they move regularly or are physically active to get an idea of how they’re feeling. “Those are simple questions that can be asked by a physician, regardless of BMI,” she added.


The group stressed the need for a comprehensive perspective on health. “When working with patients, I look at them as a whole, including family history, genetics, and other variables,” said Dr Bond. Dr Donna-Marie Manasseh, director and chief of breast surgery at Maimonides Breast Cancer Centre agreed. “In the end, assessing health status requires a scorecard that includes a range of things that are easy to measure.”